About This Site

March 18th, 2011 Leave a comment Go to comments

Thank you for visiting. This site is dedicated to exposing the Mind Control, Manipulation, Deception, Spiritual and Emotional Abuse, Heresy, Legalism (“Phariseeism”), and Authoritarianism behind the Independent Fundamental Baptist Denomination (IFB).

I was a member of a spiritually abusive Independent Fundamental Baptist Church for a little over 25 years. The focus of this site, therefore, is the issue of spiritual abuse and deception in the IFB churches. This site also has a secondary emphasis on other Christian churches, but will mostly focus on the IFB Denomination. Like others who have similar sites, the reason for concentrating on the Independent Fundamental Baptist Denomination is simply due to personal experience.

Most Baptist churches are very similar to the IFB. Some are a little different and may be less strict or have different stances on scripture, but for the most part they are all very similar. I can really only speak from my experiences so that is why this site is singling out the IFB. Much of what you will read here comes directly from my personal experience. Much of the information contained within this site can be generalized to other churches, but not all of it. I will let you, the reader, determine which applies to you and your unique situation.

I’ve been accused of making the fallacy of hasty generalizations or that I’m simply over generalizing based on just my experience. While I can’t say that every IFB church is run in a spiritually abusive manner since that would be an impossible claim to knowledge, I can easily infer, based on my experience with multiple IFB churches and based on others who I’ve talk to or shared their stories on this site, that most are. Since leaving the IFB in 1999, I have encountered many people who have come from not only IFB churches, but also other Christian churches with similar experiences of spiritual abuse.

Although I understand that good things still happen in IFB churches and that many people are brought to the Lord and salvation, I still believe that the IFB operates much like a cult. Afterall, God can use a cult to bring people to him.

Because of the definition of a cult I can’t say that the IFB is a cult exactly, however, it does have some cult characteristics which I will expose. For example the IFB churches that I have experienced, believe that a person can not truly be saved if they read a version of scripture other than the King James Version. Part of the definition of a cult is “a religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist” – Websters Dictionary

While on the surface the IFB seems to be a traditional Christian organization, within the walls of the church there is false and extreme doctrine, heavy manipulation and mind-control of its members, and manipulation of the Word of God that hurts people.

It is not the intention of this site to hurt or defame anyone. I will do my best to not single out a particular church. It is the sole intention of this site to bring into the light the hurtful and dangerous practices of the IFB.

To the right please find links to many of the false teachings of the IFB. I encourage you to speak your defense and your experiences of the IFB as well as your support of the information on this site. Finally, please feel free to participate in our monthly survey (poll changes will depend on the amount of interest this site generates).

As you read through this site, please remember that it’s not the church you are attending that saves. Only God has the power to judge a person’s heart and save him/her. Be careful to not give the IFB or any religious organization for that matter, the praise and glory that only belongs to God.

Keep in mind that even though people may make known the good things that are being done in their church or religious group does mean that there aren’t abusive things happening and does not give them the right to dismiss or excuse that abuse. It is wrong and dangerous to ignore/dismiss abuse on the grounds that good is also happening.

When discussing this with a good friend of mine he told me not to throw the baby out with the bath water, implying that I should just filter out the bad stuff that I see/experience and keep the good stuff. When it comes to church, however, I find it unacceptable that there should be such “bad stuff”. Are we not supposed to be an example of Christ to the world? I’m convinced that much of the world’s difficulties, including Atheism, is a direct result of this “bad stuff” from the church. I have spoken with many Atheists who explain to me reasons behind their decision to become an Atheists and they are very similar to the experiences I had growing up in my IFB church.

The analogy that works better here is the baker who mixed a teaspoon of dog poop in his brownie mix. Once the brownies were mixed, baked and completed, it became impossible to know where the brownies ended and the dog poop began. Even with such a tiny amount of dog poop the brownies were uneatable. And so it is with the abusive church. When a person experiences spiritual abuse from those who are supposed to imitate Christ, it becomes impossible to separate the abuse from the healthy components of the church.

Am I saying that the church and the people in the church should be perfect? Of course not. Pastors and church goers are human, however, the church should be a place where humanness is met with the Grace of God not the judgmental legalism of the Pharisees. A good friend of mine told me once that people who were abused have a tendency to shy away from the abuser and the object used to abuse. So for example a child who was abused by his father who used a belt to beat him, will forever equate his father and that belt with abuse.

The same is true for spiritual abuse. When a particular church or organization abuse a person and they use the Bible to perform the abuse, you can deduce what will happen. The one thing that a person needs to heal from an abusive situation, the Bible, is the very thing that person can’t turn to because it was the object of the abuse.

There are verses in the Bible that still to this day I can’t read without re-experiencing the abuse again. The problem is that they are the very verses I need to help in the healing process. That is what makes spiritual abuse one of the most horrific problems in today’s society.

If you wish to find out more about me, contact me or sign my guest book you may find those links at the top of this site as well. Thanks again for visiting and we hope that this information has been helpful.

  1. EBR
    December 27th, 2011 at 09:46 | #1

    There are waivers in respect to when a professional counselor can contact the authorities if one believes the patient may be harmful to oneself or others; however, one should never contact the entire congregation and share information about employment, health, and mental illness with the congregation without the consent of the individual. Even when the individual provides consent, that could still put one on shaky legal ground. The best thing ministers can do would be to refer the matter of a professional state licensed psychiatrist. If the psychiatrist and attending physician find no other medical causes, then the person can be referred for counseling by a psychologist, medical social worker, nurse, or vocational rehab counselor, or college career counselor.

    I have mixed feelings about group counseling on these situations. In some ways, it can help. But there may be people who are not yet ready for this who can’t be objective either cause they are so supportive or their situation or are so hostile to it. Many people who are recovering need a supportive environment that’s neutral. That’s not always easy to find. People want to help but may not know how to help. Sometimes it is necessary to relocate to get the help. We didn’t have the internet back then so we couldn’t network with one another. College application fees vary so even if there are colleges who may work with students from a particular IFB school, it wasn’t easy to find out which ones did and apply to them. The IFB groups would cut off their members entirely once they left. Then in some parts of the country that were very hostile, they would enter environments where they were basically treated in a way that ignored or tried to destroy that faith altogether. Some may feel this way. However, I think there are many who still want to have faith. When the school was constantly in the news in addition to having radio stations cut off their programs at least temporarily, which happened in the 1980s, one became very isolated. There are some who fared better than others if they had a supportive environment. It wasn’t easy to find that supportive environment even when people wanted to provide it. Counselors had to have experience dealing with these issues. Also people feel uncomfortable talking about this. In some environments, counselors could get into trouble for even discussing religious issues too. I think it’s important to put the entire situation in perspective with good as well as bad. Some may say there is no good. Some may say there is no bad. Most experiences in one’s lifetime have both. I’m sure I’ll hear criticism for this comment from those who find no bood or no bad. Sometimes something can seem psychological that actually has a physical origin. Things are not always what they seem to be, and it take s a professional counselor with medical surpervision and a medical background to be able to know when other referrals may be necessary as well as a definite thorough physical exam. There can also be referred pain issues or even technology that differs in one region from another. In some of the mainline denominations, state licensure is necessary for ordained ministers. Some mainline denominations also have their own medical staff. In others, there may be situations which are separate. It’s really important to have a professional team approach which respects the individual’s confidentiality within professional boundaries. Iti also takes counselors in some cases that are trained to detect learning disabilities. Some schools are better than others in working with students with learning disabilities. Some are more subtle than others as well. Many community colleges are quipped to detect and assist students with learning disabilities who may have compensated and made it through the system in elementary or high school. Many community colleges can be good bargains financially also and may be ideal for students who need to live near home and or may not know what they want to do. This goes for private junior colleges too. Some schools may offer small classes with low student teacher ratios. Many parents want to send their children to larger schools or whatever school somebody recommends but that’s not always the school that’s best for a teenagers. Sometimes a year or two working prior to going to school can help somebody appreciate the value of money or get a taste of working in different environments. I’m very skeptical of this one solution for all mentality I see.

  2. EBR
    December 27th, 2011 at 13:31 | #2

    I am not talking about situations where a church is hiring somebody on the pastoral staff or as a teacher. In those situations, the applicant gives consent for background information to be shared about one’s academic background, job experience, and aspects of one’s faith and family. This is the information that often is disclosed when a committee and church consider candidates. I am mentioning situations where a church tries to restrict a person from leaving or perhaps transferring outside their network by damaging one’s reputation unnecessarily. While I wasn’t the victim, I was in the congregation and knew that the pastoral staff at this IFB Church should not have shared this information to the congregation when the individual was leaving the church. I realized something like this could happen to me. I don’t think these churches realize that their members may see “The Writing on the wall”. It happens in secular situations too. There were two situations on the church level that happened that caused me to question everything and that’s when I left, but I left gradually. I also knew had I stayed, there would have been intense pressure to either return to the same college and/or go to one of the others recommended by the church. I haven’t gone back to either the university or the church in over 30 years either. I have been to churches that would not consider doing w hat was done in these two particular situations. I’m aware that this is a common practice among unlicensed pastors. If they were licensed, it wouldn’t be tolerated without disciplinary action. The basic attitude is “Don’t say anything. It didn’t happen to you. Stay out. Don’t be concerned.” Another prevailing attitude is “If it’s the Lord’s work, we can do anything we please whether or not it’s the law.” Is this really what Romans 13 says? I question that. We live in a Democratic Republic which gives us lots of freedoms. We can go to any church we want relatively easily also. That’s not true in other parts of the world. The type of information I want d isclosed is the type of information that’s commonly listed on resumes.

  3. EBR
    December 28th, 2011 at 13:30 | #3

    I’d change the title of the former minister from the particular church I posted from ordained minister to IFB Campus recruiter. At that point in my life, while I was vaguely aware that college recruiters existed, I really made the association with recruiters in relationship tocollee and professional sports, not religion. As I look back in time though, many years later, his focus was primarily on either BJU or Hyles Anderson. Even many recruiters look at the student and try to learn a lot about the student prior to helping an individual find the best choice of a college or university which meets one’s needs. I got the impression he met the needs of the particular college campuses he was recruiting just like company recruiters seek applicants for a particular industry.

  4. EBR
    December 29th, 2011 at 13:52 | #4

    What is the difference between what I discuss in my posts and when many churches recommend colleges and universities supported by their denominations or affiliations? I mentioned a company recruiter at a job fair. A company recruiter will tell the applicant to visit as many booths of other companies as possible. One will look at the resume to see if they are hiring for the position or qualifications posted on a resume. Many denominations do offer their members tuition discounts and scholarships. This is common. What is different is that the minister does not forbid a student from considering another school. Also most ministers at most healthy churches I’ve visited will not single out an individual publicly either or definitely will not share private information in public without consent. One must ask if the person giving consent understands what one is doing and is capable of giving that consent. Also one must pay attention to signs that a person might be reluctant to discuss this matter and should not push it and respect the individual’s decision. Another area where I feel there are abuses are in the sciences and math. I think those students have special gifts that others do not have, especially in the more advanced applications. I know there is a lot of mention of the gifts in the Bible in the book of Acts. We think of “spiritual gifts.” We don’t think of scientific or scientific people as a population in need of reach. We think of foreign c ountries. We live in a country which is very high-tech. I think it’s very important that churches realize that high tech students do have a place in the church as well as in the secular world and that these gifts must be developed wherever they exist. If we exclude the scientifist or mathmetician from our church by only referring students to schools with arts and humanities programs, we don’t develop that gift. That person we exclude could be a missionary outreach to the science and math community. That person may be needed in our own schools whether they are public or private. That person goes out to the job world and can be a ministry in one’s personal witness by one’s actions in a secular community. That person needs a college campus which is regionally and professionally accredited. Many do have medical programs. Medical school is only one aspect of the sciences. I’m talking about other fields too. We think of not using gifts in respect to money or perhaps art and music. I think it expands to other areas, and in our high-tech continent, it expands to those who are endowed in the high-tech areas of science and math. This can, overtime, cause one to lose interest in the fellowship with other Christians and with churches. Many schools do have religious organizations on or near campus too. Often many churches announce their graduates and list the schools where they are applying or attending or their alma maters after graduation. It’s not only important at graduation, but also during high school during preparation for college. Some programs require an early decision by a certain grade level. I know there is a schism with many churches in respect to the sciences and maths. Also many teaches don’t know how to teach them in a way that they are comprehended or enjoyed by students. I like sports. Not everyone was created to be a college or professional athlete or even a performing artist.

Comment pages
1 5 6 7 6
  1. No trackbacks yet.
*